VENEZUELA – Ismael Garcia vs. Ismael Garcia in most confusing election ever
MARACAY, Venezuela — The ballot for congressional elections in which Venezuela’s ruling socialists face their stiffest challenge in 16 years is confusing enough in the state of Maracay, with more than two dozen parties on the ballot.
But most worrisome for incumbent Ismael Garcia, a fierce opponent of the deeply-unpopular socialist administration, is a 28-year-old parking lot attendant whose name will appear directly beside his on the ballot, under a nearly identical party title and logo.
He, too, is named Ismael Garcia. And three weeks ahead of the Dec. 6 vote he has yet to make a public campaign appearance or even explain his platform.
The result has been a bizarre campaign in which political veteran Ismael Garcia is mostly focused on helping voters identify him correctly when they go to the polls.
Opposition* leaders say the race in Maracay is the most blatant example of a trick the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela, which has never lost a national election, is using in its effort to keep control of the National Assembly [similar to U.S. Congress] despite dismal poll ratings. With the world’s highest inflation, second-highest homicide rate, and a deepening recession, just 10 percent of voters say they are happy with how things are going. Polling suggests the opposition could win control of the 165-seat congress by a landslide. [*The opposition is defined as: a person or group that you are trying to defeat or succeed against; a person or group that you are competing with (in this article: a rival political party)]
“It shows how crazy and desperate the government has become. They have fake candidates posing as the opposition in almost every contest in the country,” the older Garcia said, canvassing a neighborhood of low-slung cinderblock homes where he handed out fliers showing a mock-up of the ballot with a bright red arrow pointing to his name.
The opposition’s slogan for the district, which it won by a slim margin in the last legislative elections is: “Don’t get confused.” It would be easy enough to make a mistake. The names of the Garcias’ parties are MUD Unity for the opposition and MIN Unity for the third-party.
Opposition figures have tried to unite their often-fragmented forces under the MUD Unity coalition to avoid splitting the anti-government vote. They say the government is trying to undercut that strategy with pseudo-opposition parties, chief among them the younger Garcia’s MIN, whose blue-colored “Unity” symbol is almost identical to that of the MUD. …..
The head of the Washington-based Organization of American States, Luis Almagro, recently accused Venezuela’s government of undermining the validity of the coming election through dirty dealing, including allowing MIN Unity to confuse voters. Other tactics that have drawn international criticism include the jailing of prominent opposition leaders who might otherwise win seats, the use of state media and official events to promote socialist candidates, and the redrawing of electoral districts to favor the ruling party.
In Maracay, the young Garcia said party leaders have barred him from speaking to the press because of security concerns and declined to explain who suggested three months ago that he run for office. His party opened its still mostly empty regional headquarters last month in a storefront the size of a two car-garage. It received its first shipment of branded baseball caps last week. (see “Background” below for more)
ARGENTINA – Conservative ousts leftist Peronists from power
BUENOS AIRES—The conservative mayor of Buenos Aires, Mauricio Macri, was elected president of Argentina on Sunday, November 22, in a win seen as a rejection of departing president Cristina Kirchner’s interventionist (in this instance socialist) economic policies and a turn to the right after 12 years of leftist rule.
With 90% of votes counted by the electoral authority on Sunday night, Mr. Macri, the candidate of the Let’s Change opposition coalition, had 52.2%, ahead of ruling-party candidate Daniel Scioli with 47.8%. Mr. Scioli acknowledged “the will of the people” in a dramatic speech late Sunday.
Minutes later, Mr. Macri, in a victory speech before euphoric crowds, said, “Today is a historic day,” adding, “We need to build an Argentina with zero poverty. A marvelous phase is beginning for Argentina.”
The pro-business, conservative mayor of Buenos Aires defeated Daniel Scioli, the left-wing anointed successor of Cristina Kirchner who was constitutionally barred from standing for a third term.
Mr. Macri’s win marked a major political shift and the end of 12 years of Peronist* rule by Mrs. Kirchner and her late husband Nestor Kirchner, which was characterized by populist welfare policies resulting in slow economic growth, inflation of over 20 percent, corruption, and unsustainable government spending. [*Peronism is defined by Merriam-Webster as: the political, economic, and social principles and policies associated with Argentine President Juan Perón and his regime and usually regarded as fascist]
The new president will be Argentina’ most economically conservative leader since the 1990s and promised to lift trade restrictions, lower taxes, and negotiate with foreign creditors currently suing the Kirchner government.
Mr. Macri said: “We want to build good relations with all of Latin America and with the world. We want to have good relations with all countries.
He added: “Argentina’s big problem today is that for four years there has been no growth, for four years no jobs have been created, and now we have to get the country moving.”
At his victory rally Felisa Sanchez, a supporter waving an Argentine flag, said: “I feel so happy because today we put an end to the mafia. They claimed to be Robin Hood helping the poor with social welfare plans when the poor are really helped with jobs and education.”
Mr. Macri, 56, who will assume office on Dec 10, is the son of one of the Argentina’s’s wealthiest families and a former president of Boca Juniors, the popular football club in Buenos Aires. In the early 1990s he was kidnapped for ransom.
His opponent Mr. Scioli, 58, a former speed boat racing champion who lost an arm in an accident in 1989, was originally the clear favorite but lacked the charisma that had helped keep Mrs. Kirchner in power.
BURKINA FASO – Citizens vote in historic election to choose their own leader
Burkina Faso voted on Sunday in a historic election to choose the country’s first new president in decades, a year after longtime leader Blaise Compaore was toppled in a popular uprising.
It represents a turning point for a west African nation which, for most of its history since independence from France in 1960, has been ruled by leaders who came to power in coups.
Mr. Compaore seized power by that route and ruled for 27 years, winning four elections, all of which were criticised as unfair. He was ousted in October 2014 when demonstrators protested against his attempt to change the constitution to extend his tenure.
But a successful election would establish the country as a beacon for democratic aspirations in Africa, where veteran rulers in Burundi and Congo Republic have changed constitutions to pave the way for extended terms in office.
“I am proud to have accomplished my duty as a citizen … It’s the first time that I can be really sure that we won’t end up with Blaise Compaore,” said Ousmane Ouedraogo, as he cast his ballot in the capital Ouagadougou.
People formed long lines at polling stations to vote for the president to serve for a five year term and deputies for the national assembly. Polls closed at 6pm GMT. A second round will be held if no candidate secures a majority.
Analysts say only two of the 14 presidential candidates stand a real chance of winning.
One is Roch Marc Kabore, prime minister and president of the national assembly under Mr. Compaore. The other is Zephirin Diabre, who was minister of finance in the 1990s before stepping down to start an opposition party.
Mr. Kabore heads the Movement of People for Progress (MPP), made up of disaffected allies of Compaore who left the party months before he stood down. Mr. Diabre fronts the Union for Progress and Change (UPC), which was the formal opposition.
Mr. Kabore draws support from the business elite and, as a member of the largest ethnic group, traditional chiefs. Mr. Diabre has international ties from his years at the United Nations Development Programme and at Areva, a French nuclear company.
“We must do everything to show that civilians can ensure the correct government of the country and restore it to democratic normality,” Mr. Kabore said as he cast his ballot.
Many people say they will vote for the candidate who has the best chance of promoting economic growth in a landlocked country that exports gold and cotton but remains impoverished.
The election was pushed back from October 11 because of an abortive coup in September by members of the elite presidential guard, in which transitional president Michel Kafando and his prime minister were taken hostage.
That coup cost more than $50 million in lost revenue, trimming growth by 0.3 percentage points. The guard has since been disbanded. Mr. Kafando will step down once a new leader is sworn in.
Corruption and justice are also issues for voters, prompting a resurgence in the popularity of former leader Thomas Sankara, a Marxist revolutionary dubbed “Africa’s Che Guevara” who was assassinated in a 1987 coup led by Mr. Compaore.
(The news briefs above are from wire reports and staff reports posted at NY Post on Nov. 16, The Wall Street Journal & Daily Telegraph on Nov. 22 and Reuters on Nov. 29.)
VENEZUELA
The ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela
President Nicholas Maduro is the hand-picked successor of socialist autocratic President Hugo Chavez. He continues Chavez’s policies. Having risen from a Caracas bus driver to Chavez’s vice president, Mr. Maduro won an April 2013 election to succeed him after his death from cancer. Opponents mock him as a poor imitation of Chavez, Venezuela’s leader of 14 years, arguing that he is ruining the country by continuing the same model of authoritarian leadership and failed leftist economic policies. (from London’s Daily Telegraph October 2013)
A gifted, charismatic orator with a keen ability to connect with the poor masses, Hugo Chavez was able to marshal public backing for a series of referendums that created a new constitution and permitted him to bring every important institution – from the legislature to the state oil company – under his control.
Chavez also advanced on what he called 21st-century socialism, which included the nationalization of hundreds of companies, the seizure of large land holdings, price controls and currency regulations. In speeches blaming capitalism for society’s ills, Mr. Chavez said his policies had made Venezuela a more prosperous country, independent of U.S. meddling and influence.
But throughout his presidency, Venezuela’s economy was plagued by blackouts, food shortages and a lack of investment, as government interventions, from price controls to the seizures of land and companies, squelched private enterprise.
Though his government was blessed by historically high oil prices, with a barrel hitting $150 in 2008, the economy in Venezuela [only] expanded by about 3 percent a year through his presidency, while much of Latin America boomed. (from washingtonpost.com)
President Maduro continues the same harmful policies, which has led to the unpopularity of his socialist party.
ARGENTINA
A Populist ‘Pink Tide’ Is Ebbing in South America, Argentine Vote Suggests:
The presidential victory of center-right politician Mauricio Macri in Argentina marks a potential turning of the so-called pink tide of populist political movements that swept South America sharply leftward over the past 17 years.
While some populists, such as Bolivia’s Evo Morales, remain popular and firmly entrenched in power, others are now fading thanks to the decline in commodity prices that fuels the region’s exports, a string of corruption scandals, economic mismanagement and voters’ desire for change.
Mr. Macri’s win in Buenos Aires on Sunday ends 12 years of “Kirchnerismo,” a populist brand of leftist politics embodied by President Cristina Kirchner and her late husband, Néstor. Together, the pair nationalized industries, stripped the central bank of independence, and ramped up spending and subsidies. Those policies lifted incomes temporarily but hurt investment and stoked inflation.
In Brazil, leftist Dilma Rousseff, a former guerrilla who belongs to the Workers’ Party, is struggling with a 10% approval rating amid the country’s biggest economic slump in 25 years and a long-running corruption scandal involving state-oil giant Petrobras.
On Dec. 6, Venezuelans are expected to hand President Nicolás Maduro, the heir to the late leftist firebrand Hugo Chávez, a big loss in midterm elections there. Polls show the opposition winning by at least 20 percentage points, likely giving it control over congress and giving momentum to a possible recall vote on Mr. Maduro.
“What happened in Argentina yesterday was the first change in Latin America,” said Maílson da Nóbrega, former Brazilian finance minister and partner in the consultancy Tendências Consultoria in São Paulo. “It may be the start of a downfall in populist governments. I think the next one should be Venezuela…And I think Brazil will follow suit in 2018.” (from a Nov. 23 WSJ article: "A Populist ‘Pink Tide’ Is Ebbing in South America, Argentine Vote Suggests" [to access the full article, do an internet search of the headline]