Weekly Editorial - January 3, 2015
1. What is the main idea of Mr. Metaxas’ commentary?
2. Mr. Metaxas writes in para. 10-11:
There’s more. The fine-tuning necessary for life to exist on a planet is nothing compared with the fine-tuning required for the universe to exist at all. For example, astrophysicists now know that the values of the four fundamental forces - gravity, the electromagnetic force, and the “strong” and “weak” nuclear forces - were determined less than one millionth of a second after the big bang. Alter any one value and the universe could not exist. For instance, if the ratio between the nuclear strong force and the electromagnetic force had been off by the tiniest fraction of the tiniest fraction - by even one part in 100,000,000,000,000,000 - then no stars could have ever formed at all….Multiply that single parameter by all the other necessary conditions, and the odds against the universe existing are so heart-stoppingly astronomical that the notion that it all “just happened” defies common sense. It would be like tossing a coin and having it come up heads 10 quintillion times in a row. Really?
Are you surprised by these facts? Explain your answer.
3. Do you agrree or disagree with Mr. Metaxas’ assertion about a Creator? Explain your answer.
OPTIONAL: Email your reaction to Mr. Metaxas’ commentary to: ericmetaxas.com/contact. Remember to identify yourself (name, school, state), name the article you are commenting on, and that you read it at StudentNewsDaily.com. Be clear, concise and polite.