Utah lawmakers pass bill allowing for execution by firing squad
Daily News Article — Posted on March 12, 2015
(by James Queally, Los Angeles Times) – Utah will be able to use a firing squad to execute death row inmates when lethal-injection drugs are unavailable, as long as the governor signs a bill that cleared the state Senate on Tuesday.
The bill, sponsored by Republican Rep. Paul Ray, passed by a vote of 18 to 10. Ray introduced the legislation in December, but he said he began drafting it last March, long before [several botched] executions in Oklahoma, Arizona and Ohio….
If Gov. Gary Herbert signs it, the bill will allow the Utah Department of Corrections to execute inmates by firing squad if the state does not have access to the drugs necessary to conduct a lethal injection. Ray said that Utah uses a [combination] of three-drugs to perform lethal injections, but that it no longer has access to pentobarbital, a necessary barbiturate for the procedure.
Utah and Oklahoma are the only states in the country where execution by firing squad is technically still legal. Death row inmates condemned in Utah before 2004 had the option to choose to die by firing squad.
“Any form of death is obviously a serious subject, so the two reasons I chose it were, obviously, No. 1, that’s what we’ve done in the past, and secondly, out of all the other options, it is the most humane,” Ray told the Los Angeles Times.
Utah has not executed a prisoner since 2010, when Ronnie Lee Gardner [who shot and killed an attorney while on trial for another murder] chose to die by firing squad, Ray said. Utah adopted lethal injection as its preferred method of execution in 2004, but inmates such as Gardner, who were sentenced before the law changed, had the option to die by firing squad.
The state is not scheduled to execute another prisoner until at least 2017, according to Ray, so it would be at least two years before a firing squad might be used in an execution.
Governor Herbert has not said whether he will sign the bill, and a spokeswoman for Herbert told The Times that it was not clear when he would review Ray’s legislation.
In a statement, Herbert made clear that lethal injection is the preferred method of execution in the state, but he acknowledged that Utah officials had struggled to obtain pentobarbital.
“We are dedicated to pursuing all reasonable and legal options to obtain those substances to make sure that, when required, we are in a position to carry out this very serious sentence by lethal injection,” he said in the statement.
Since 1976, there have been only three executions by firing squad in the U.S. … In Oklahoma, death by firing squad remains legal only as a fail-safe, to be used in the event that death by lethal injection were ever ruled unconstitutional.
The use of lethal injection has been subject to scrutiny in the last year, as many defense attorneys and civil rights advocates have sued various states to obtain information about the drugs used in their executions [by lethal injection].
Many states have turned to new chemical cocktails to carry out lethal injections, as foreign pharmaceutical companies that used to sell pentobarbital and phenobarbital in the U.S. have publicly opposed the drugs’ use in executions in recent years [and refused to sell the drugs for that purpose].
The use of new drugs has led to a series of [botched] executions. Oklahoma officials chose to use a [new] sedative … for the first time as part of the lethal cocktail used to execute Clayton Lockett in April, and it took 43 minutes for the convicted murderer to die. Similar incidents were reported during executions in Arizona and Ohio last year, and Ohio chose to suspend all executions for one year after deciding to discontinue a lethal-injection cocktail that included [that new sedative].
Reprinted here for educational purposes only. May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from the Los Angeles Tmes. Visit the website at latimes.com.
Questions
1. If signed into law by the governor, what would the bill passed by Utah’s senate on Tuesday allow the state to do?
2. How does Utah state Rep. Paul Ray explain his reason for proposing this legislation?
3. In 2004, Utah made lethal injection the only form of capital punishment permitted. Why was the last execution performed in the state (in 2010) done by firing squad?
4. When is the next execution scheduled to take place in Utah?
5. How is Utah’s Gov. Gary Herbert expected to respond to the bill passed by the state house and senate?
6. What is the only other state that allows execution by firing squad? In what circumstances would this be used?
7. Why is there a shortage of one of the drugs used for lethal injection executions?
8. Some in the media have portrayed the Republican-led passage of a law legalizing execution by firing squad as inhumane or barbaric as compared to lethal injection. Why do you think these state representatives voted for a measure that is portrayed as inhumane?
CHALLENGE: Do you think people who support physician assisted suicide but oppose the death penalty as inhumane punishment would support it if the state used the same drugs doctors used for physician assisted suicide?
Ask 3-5 people if they support one but not the other and to answer the question above.
Background
Capital punishment in the U.S.
- Currently, lethal injection is the method used or allowed in all of the 32 states which allow the death penalty.
- Although lethal injection dominates as a method of execution, some states allow prisoners on death row to choose the method used to execute them.
- From 1976 to August 6, 2014, there were 1,386 executions in the U.S., of which 1,211 were by lethal injection, 158 by electrocution, 11 by gas chamber, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.
- In 2004, Utah made lethal injection the only form of capital punishment. However, those already on death row were grandfathered on the type of execution they chose at sentencing. At the time of the change in the law there were still three inmates on Utah's death row who had selected firing squad.
- The two states that still allow hanging are New Hampshire, which allows it at the decision of the Corrections officials, and Washington, at the decision of the prisoner.
- In the 2010s, American jurisdictions have experienced a shortage of lethal injection drugs, due to anti-death penalty advocacy and low production volume. Hospira, the only U.S. manufacturer of sodium thiopental, stopped making the drug in 2011. The European Union has outlawed the export of any product that could be used in an execution; this has prevented Corrections officials from using EU-manufactured anesthetics like propofol which are needed for general medical purposes. Another alternative, pentobarbital, is also only manufactured in the European Union, which has caused the Danish producer to restrict distribution to U.S. government customers. (from wikipedia)
Meet the woman behind a shortage of execution drugs
- Thirty-two U.S. states and the federal government have the death penalty, and all of them use lethal injection, with various drugs, as the primary method.
- Many states have been having trouble getting a hold of the execution drugs.
- The reason for the shortage: a woman named Maya Foa. She works for a British group which campaigns against the death penalty. "I don't believe there's such a thing as a humane execution," she said. "We have executions which are lasting 25 minutes, and the prisoner's dying in agony. That for me as a form of 'just' punishment is a contradiction in terms."
- In 2011, Foa began researching pentobarbital, the drug most commonly used in U.S. executions. It was developed to treat epilepsy, but in the high doses used in lethal injections it causes respiratory arrest.
- Foa discovered that the only company with approval from the FDA to sell pentobarbital in the U.S. was a Danish pharmaceutical company called Lundbeck. The death penalty has been banned in the European Union so she made the information public, hoping to force Lundbeck to stop selling pentobarbital to U.S. prisons.
- "It was a scandal," Foa said. "It was extraordinary. It was a scandal. It was a big deal in Denmark, and it was a real problem for the company."
- At Lundbeck's headquarters in Vopenhagen, communications chief, Anders Schroll, told us Lundbeck had not known its epilepsy drug was being used in executions. "That was certainly a shock for Lundbeck because this is completely against what we stand for," Schroll said. "Our researchers go to the lab every day to save people's lives, and this is completely against why they work."
- With Foa's help, Lundbeck developed a new sales system to control who purchased their drugs. That has shut down the supply of FDA-approved pentobarbital to U.S. prisons, and led 10 other pharmaceutical companies to follow suit, to stop their drugs being used in executions. (from a CBSNews on April 30)