The Texas Medical Board approved new rules on experimental stem cell therapies such as the one Gov. Rick Perry underwent during back surgery last year.

(by Nathan Koppel, The Wall Street Journal, WSJ.com) –  [The Texas Medical Board on Friday approved new rules on experimental stem cell therapies] that would make it easier for doctors to offer experimental treatments using adult stem cells without federal approval [which requiries patients to give their consent and a federal review board to approve the procedure before using adult stem cells.]

The Texas Medical Board, which licenses and disciplines doctors in the state, recently drafted stem-cell rules at the behest of Dr. Stanley Jones of Houston, who in July injected Gov. Rick Perry with the governor’s own stem cells to try to aid his recovery from a back injury.

The governor, who appoints all the members of the Medical Board, has encouraged the agency to create rules governing adult stem-cell treatments, which involve removing a patient’s stem cells and reinserting them in the hopes of aiding muscle, nerve or blood cells damaged by such conditions as cancer, osteoarthritis or multiple sclerosis.

“It is my hope that Texas will become the world’s leader in the research and use of adult stem cells,” Mr. Perry wrote in a July letter to the president of the Texas Medical Board.

But critics say the proposed rules give doctors too much leeway to perform stem-cell procedures that haven’t been proved safe or effective.

“The guidelines are skewed to favor business interests instead of patient safety,” said Leigh Turner, a bioethics professor at the University of Minnesota. Many adult stem-cell procedures, he said, are experimental and can give rise to blood clots and other complications.

The procedures in question are different from embryonic stem-cell research, which some religious and political groups [Conservatives and many Republicans] oppose on the grounds that it…destroys human embryos [human lives].

But adult stem-cell procedures also have been controversial. Some, such as bone-marrow transplants, have a proven track record, but physicians increasingly seek to offer more innovative treatments that can cost thousands of dollars.

One obstacle to doctors has been the Food and Drug Administration [FDA], which requires physicians to seek the agency’s approval before offering experimental, adult stem-cell treatments. Doctors complain the FDA approval process can be costly and time-consuming.

The FDA said in a statement it doesn’t comment on state regulations or proposed regulations. “Our position on stem cells remains the same. The FDA has regulatory authority over human cells, tissues and/or cellular and tissue-based products.”

The [new] Texas rules would allow doctors to bypass the FDA so long as they satisfy other conditions before offering certain experimental adult stem-cell treatments, including obtaining patient consent and securing approval from an…independent review board, a committee that monitors medical research and is often affiliated with a hospital or university.

But such boards are a poor substitute for FDA oversight, according to some scientists who say the boards have varying standards and levels of expertise.

Some “might be more strict than others,” said Bettie Sue Masters, a chemistry professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio. Boards might be strong-armed by the physicians who are paying the boards’ fees, she added.

Lucy Nashed, a spokeswoman for Mr. Perry, said he has left it to the Texas Medical Board to devise the proper regulatory framework. “The governor believes that Texas has the potential with this kind of technology to find treatments for cancer and other diseases,” she said. The board has the authority to enact the rules itself.

Irvin Zeitler Jr., Texas Medical Board president, said the agency wrote the rules in part because the FDA doesn’t have clear regulatory authority over adult stem-cell treatments. “The board has no intent to circumvent federal law,” he said. Independent boards, he added, can provide effective oversight.

Supporters say the new rules would give doctors and patients more autonomy. “These rules will make accessible emerging technologies that are proving to be safe and effective,” said Dr. David Harris of Austin, who specializes in sports injuries.

[The board said it will establish a registry to track the outcomes of each stem cell treatment performed on a patient. Details of that have not yet been worked out.

No date was set for the new Texas policy to take effect, but it will be at least 30 days, staffers said.   FDA approval for the national use of adult stem cells is thought to be five to ten years away.]

[NOTE: This article was published at wsj.com on April 12, 2012.]

Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted here for educational purposes only. Visit the website at wsj.com.

Questions

NOTE TO STUDENTS:  Before you answer the questions, read the “Background” below explaining the difference between ADULT STEM CELLS and EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS.

1.  Where do doctors get the adult stem cells they use in their treatments?

2.  For what types of treatment do doctors use adult stem cells?

3.  Under the new Texas rules, what requirements must doctors meet when using adult stem cells?

4.  What problem do doctors have with obtaining FDA approval?

5.  a) Two college professors are quoted by the reporter for this article.  For what reasons do they oppose the use of adult stem cells?
b)  What do you think: are can and might good enough reasons for all experimental treatment using adult stem cells to be halted?  Explain your answer.

6.  The majority of news articles about stem cell treatments support the use of embryonic stem cells.  
a)  Do you think this reporter presents an unbiased report [not favoring one side or the other] on the Texas Medical Board’s decision to allow doctors to use experimental treatments using adult stem cells? Explain your answer.
b)  Ask a parent the same question.

7.  Consider the following:

  • Adult stem cells have been successfully used to treat many diseases (read “Background” and see link under “Resources” below).  Does the article present the positive results of adult stem cell treatment strongly enough?
  • Would most/some doctors be willing to use experimental adult stem cell treatment on a patient if he/she thought it would endanger a patient and result in a lawsuit?
  • Are most doctors incompetent and greedy, willing to risk the life and/or health of their patients just to make money?
  • In paragraph 8, the reporter states that adult stem-cell procedures also have been controversial…because they cost thousands of dollars.  [Most medical procedures cost thousands of dollars.]
  • Articles about embryonic stem cells rarely include the word controversial.  Most of the articles on Texas’ adult stem cell ruling include the word controversial, and focus on adult stem cell procedures as being “unproven, expensive treatments”
  • Is the FDA as a federal government agency better able to establish rules for stem cell treatment in Texas than the Texas Medical Board is?
  • The same experts who oppose the use of adult stem cells for being unproven support the use of embryonic stem cells without reservation.
  • Is it wrong to be opposed to embryonic stem-cell research on the ground that it can destroy human embryos?

Do your answers/thoughts about these points cause you to re-think your initial reaction to this article on the Texas Medical Board’s decision?  Explain your answer.

Background

Adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells. (from njfpc.org/Articles/AdultStem.asp)
  • Adult stem cell research has been on-going for 20-30 years, is not under any government restriction, and does not require the destruction of human life. These [adult] stem cells have already been used to treat spinal cord injuries, Leukemia, and even Parkinson’s disease . Adult stem cells are derived from umbilical cords, placentas, amniotic fluid, various tissues and organ systems like skin and the liver, and even fat obtained from liposuction.
  • In contrast, embryonic stem cells are obtained by harvesting living embryos generally 5 to 7 days old, which are destroyed in the process. Most importantly, embryonic stem cells have never yet been successfully used to help cure disease. In fact, in animals they have caused tumors and other complications. Embryonic stem cells are also being touted by some as a possible treatment for repairing the brains of Alzheimer’s patients, but stem cell researchers confess that this is a distortion that is not being aggressively corrected by scientists.
  • A new poll, conducted by International Communications Research, reveals that once Americans understand the difference between adult and embryonic stem cells, Americans strongly prefer funding adult stem cell research that does not destroy human life, by a margin of 61% to 23%. So, what is driving the biotech industry and many government officials to press for government money to subsidize embryonic stem cell research? Free money, and research without ethical limitations.
  • Private industry has not been willing to put up any large sums of money on their own for embryonic stem cell research, because they are not sure it will yield the results they hope for. However, some drugmakers are getting into the field of research utilizing adult stem cells from umbilical cord blood and bone marrow.  Investors are now taking notice that adult cells are actually working with human patients, and researchers are finding that these cells appear to be as flexible as the embryonic type.

Background on Adult Stem Cells vs. Embryonic Stem Cells: (from pbs.org, a Newshour Extra report on the Stem Cell Research Debate by Lisa Prososki)
Stem cells are universal cells that have the ability to develop into specialized types of tissues that can then be used throughout the body to treat diseases or injuries. Stem Cell Research is a topic embroiled in much controversy. Scientists are hopeful that one day stem cells will be used to grow new organs such as kidneys or spinal cords as well as different types of tissues such as nerves, muscles, and blood vessels. The controversy sparked by the use of stem cells and research in this area comes from the fact that…these cells are taken from embryos that are just days old. As a result of this, the embryo, which is a developing human life, is destroyed. Many people feel it is immoral and unethical to destroy embryos for the sake of science. To further the debate, while these cells are easily cultured, replicate quickly, and have a relatively long life, embryonic stem cells have not yet been successfully used to provide any kind of therapy for humans and pose risks such as tumor growth and rejection by the body.

On the other side of the issue is the use of adult stem cells for research. Adult stem cells are available from a variety of sources including blood from the umbilical cord, the placenta, bone marrow, and even human fat. ….they may have some limitations in the type of tissues they are able to form. For many years, adult stem cells have been used to provide a number of different therapies to people with a relatively high rate of success. Recent research has shown that adult stem cells taken from one area of the body are able to regenerate and form tissues of a different kind. In addition to the proven therapies and research, the use of adult stem cells from a patient’s own body decreases the risk of rejection because the cells are not seen as foreign invaders.

All in all, many scientists believe that the use of adult stem cells should be the primary focus of stem cell research based on past success, lower chances of patient rejection, and the idea that adult stem cell research does not spark the moral, ethical, and political debate seen so frequently when the use of embryonic stem cells is considered. (from “Background” in a Dec. 2008 StudentNewsDaily article)

Resources

For a list of diseases that may currently be treated with hematopoietic stem cells (adult stem cells from bone marrow) at:
marrow.org/Physicians/When_to_Transplant/Diseases_Transplanted.aspx

Get Free Answers

Daily “Answers” emails are provided for Daily News Articles, Tuesday’s World Events and Friday’s News Quiz.