(by Julia Manchester, TheHill) – Defense Secretary James Mattis on Sunday issued a stark warning to North Korea, saying the country would be met with a “massive military response” if it threatened the U.S. or its allies.
[North Korea has been working to develop a nuclear-tipped missile capable of hitting the United States and has recently threatened to land missiles near the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam. Secretary Mattis’ warning was in response to the following actions by North Korea:“Any threat to the United States or its territories including Guam or our allies will be met with a massive military response,” Mattis said in a statement outside of the White House after meeting with President Trump [and top military commanders].
“Kim Jong Un should take heed of the United Nations Security Council’s unified voice. All members unanimously agreed on the threat North Korea poses. And they remain unanimous in their commitment to the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. Because we are not looking to the total annihilation of a country, namely, North Korea,” he continued.
Mattis said the U.S. had “many military options” regarding the Korean peninsula, and that the president wanted to be briefed on all of them.
North Korea’s move is a show of defiance against Washington and the international community.
The White House in a statement released Sunday evening said Trump spoke to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe about North Korea’s test and that the two “pledged to continue close cooperation.”
“President Trump reaffirmed the commitment of the United States to defending our homeland, territories, and allies using the full range of diplomatic, conventional, and nuclear capabilities at our disposal,” the White House said.
The UN Security Council unanimously voted last month to impose sanctions on Pyongyang after the country launched a series of ICBMs [Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles].
The council announced it would be having an emergency meeting [on Monday] to discuss the developments. [See “Resources” below for video of U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley’s comments.]
The Defense secretary’s statement matches President Trump’s recent hawkish statements regarding North Korea.
Trump strongly condemned Pyongyang’s actions, saying the U.S. was considering imposing sanctions on [any country doing business with North Korea].
When asked whether the U.S. would attack North Korea, Trump responded “We’ll see.”
The president said last month North Korea would be met with “fire and fury” if it continued to threaten the U.S. and its allies. [Responding to critics who opposed his tough talk, the President said, “It’s about time that somebody stuck up for the people of this country and for the people of other countries. So if anything, maybe that statement wasn’t tough enough. And we’re backed 100% by our military.”
Last week, President Trump said that talking with North Korea was no longer the answer, after the country launched an ICBM [Intercontinental Ballistic Missile] over Japanese airspace. [He tweeted:]
First published at thehill on September 3rd. Reprinted here for educational purposes only. May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from The Hill. Visit the website at thehill .com.
1. The first paragraph of a news article should answer the questions who, what, where and when. List the who, what, where and when of this article. (NOTE: The remainder of a news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
2. What provocative actions has North Korea taken over the past few months?
3. What warning did U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis issue to North Korea in statement outside the White House on Sunday?
4. How did the Hill reporter characterize North Korea’s recent actions?
5. What statement did the White House issue Sunday night following President Trump’s phone call with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe?
6. Ask a parent: Do you agree or disagree with the Trump administration’s threat of military retaliation should North Korea attack us or our territories or allies? Please explain your answer.
ON THE U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL: (read more at the website un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_background.html)
About the Defense Department: