(from YahooNews, by Associated Press) IVANPAH DRY LAKE, Calif. – Federal wildlife investigators who visited the BrightSource Energy plant last year and watched as birds burned and fell, reporting an average of one “streamer” every two minutes, are urging California officials to halt the operator’s application to build a still-bigger version.
The investigators want the halt until the full extent of the deaths can be assessed. Estimates per year now range from a low of about a thousand by BrightSource to 28,000 by an expert for the Center for Biological Diversity environmental group.
Workers at a state-of-the-art solar plant in the Mojave Desert have a name for birds that fly through the plant’s concentrated sun rays — “streamers,” for the smoke plume that comes from birds that ignite in midair.
The deaths are “alarming. It’s hard to say whether that’s the location or the technology,” said Garry George, renewable-energy director for the California chapter of the Audubon Society. “There needs to be some caution.”
The bird kills mark the latest instance in which the quest for clean energy sometimes has inadvertent environmental harm. Solar farms have been criticized for their impacts on desert tortoises, and wind farms have killed birds, including numerous raptors [a bird of prey, e.g., an eagle, hawk, falcon, or owl].
“We take this issue very seriously,” said Jeff Holland, a spokesman for NRG Solar of Carlsbad, California, the second of the three companies behind the plant. The third, Google, deferred comment to its partners.
The $2.2 billion plant, which launched in February, is at Ivanpah Dry Lake near the California-Nevada border. The operator says it’s the world’s biggest plant to employ so-called power towers.
More than 300,000 mirrors, each the size of a garage door, reflect solar rays onto three boiler towers each looming up to 40 stories high. The water inside is heated to produce steam, which turns turbines that generate enough electricity for 140,000 homes.
Sun rays sent up by the field of mirrors are bright enough to dazzle pilots flying in and out of Las Vegas and Los Angeles.
Federal wildlife officials said Ivanpah might act as a “mega-trap” for wildlife, with the bright light of the plant attracting insects, which in turn attract insect-eating birds that fly to their death in the intensely focused light rays.
Federal and state biologists call the number of deaths significant, based on sightings of birds getting singed and falling, and on retrieval of carcasses with feathers charred too severely for flight.
Ivanpah officials dispute the source of the so-called streamers, saying at least some of the puffs of smoke mark insects and bits of airborne trash being ignited by the solar rays.
Wildlife officials who witnessed the phenomena say many of the clouds of smoke were too big to come from anything but a bird, and they add that they saw “birds entering the solar flux and igniting, consequently become a streamer.”
U.S. Fish and Wildlife officials say they want a death toll for a full year of operation.
Given the apparent scale of bird deaths at Ivanpah, authorities should thoroughly track bird kills there for a year, including during annual migratory seasons, before granting any more permits for that kind of solar technology, said George, of the Audubon Society.
The toll on birds has been surprising, said Robert Weisenmiller, chairman of the California Energy Commission. “We didn’t see a lot of impact” on birds at the first, smaller power towers in the U.S. and Europe, Weisenmiller said.
The commission is now considering the application from Oakland-based BrightSource to build a mirror field and a 75-story power tower that would reach above the sand dunes and creek washes between Joshua Tree National Park and the California-Arizona border.
The proposed plant is on a flight path for birds between the Colorado River and California’s largest lake, the Salton Sea — an area, experts say, is richer in avian life than the Ivanpah plant, with protected golden eagles and peregrine falcons and more than 100 other species of birds recorded there.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials warned California this month that the power-tower style of solar technology holds “the highest lethality potential” of the many solar projects burgeoning in the deserts of California.
The commission’s staff estimates the proposed new tower would be almost four times as dangerous to birds as the Ivanpah plant. The agency is expected to decide this autumn on the proposal.
Associated Press. Published at yahoonews .com on Aug. 18. Reprinted here for educational purposes only. May not be reproduced on other websites without permission from the Associated Press. Visit the website at ap .com.
Welcome back teachers and students!
PLEASE NOTE: “Answers” emails resume today.
Also, check out our updated "Election" resources page at: studentnewsdaily.com/election-resources-for-teachers/
1. The first paragraph of a news article should answer the questions who, what, where and when. List the who, what, where and when of this news item. (NOTE: The remainder of a news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
2. a) What do federal wildlife investigators want to determine before BrightSource Energy begins building a second, larger plant?
b) What does the Audubon Society want authorities to do before granting any more permits for the “power tower” type of solar technology?
3. Compare the number of bird deaths reported by BrightSource with environmental group Center for Biological Diversity.
4. a) Define “clean energy” as used in para. 5.
b) In what ways does clean energy harm wildlife?
c) What potential negative effects might BrightEnergy’s plant have on people? (see para. 9)
5. How have the three companies backing the BrightEnergy plant responded to the federal wildlife investigators’ report?
6. Explain how BrightSource generates electricity.
7. BrightSource’s solar thermal energy systems generate power the same way as traditional power plants – by creating high temperature steam to turn a turbine. However, instead of using fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) or nuclear power to create the steam, BrightSource uses the sun’s energy.
a) If this type of clean energy kills large numbers of birds, but avoids burning fossil fuels, is it worth the cost? Explain your answer.
b) If this type of clean energy could possibly affect the eyesight of pilots flying in and out of Las Vegas and Los Angeles. , but doesn’t hurt birds and avoids burning fossil fuels, is it worth the cost? Explain your answer.
DID YOU KNOW? StudentNewsDaily now has an app. Go to studentnewsdaily.com/current-events-app/ for the links.
More from the AP article above:
NOTE: Under "The Clean Energy Standard Act of 2012" as of 2015, the federal government will require large utility companies to obtain a percentage of the electricity they sell from clean energy sources. Read the law at: energy.senate.gov.