
U.S. Army soldiers participate in close arm combatives during the Ranger Course on Fort Benning, Georgia, April 20, 2015. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Nikayla Shodeen)
redo Jump to...
print Print...
(JustTheNews and NY Post) – Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Monday announced that the Pentagon would end the practice of setting separate physical fitness standards for women to serve in combat roles.
“All combat roles are open to men and women BUT they must all meet the same, high standard. No standards will be lowered AND all combat roles will only have sex-neutral standards. Common sense,” he posted on X. …
“Different physical standards for men and women in the U.S. military have existed for a long time,” he [noted]. “BUT, there were also combat roles that were male-only.
Then, under Obama, all combat roles were opened to men AND women. BUT, different physical fitness standards for men and women remained.
Today at [the Department of Defense] — we fix this.”
Secretary Hegseth issued a memo [“Combat Arms Standards”] Monday ordering men and women to meet the same physical fitness requirements if they want to serve in combat roles, saying the Pentagon had “allowed standards to slip.”
“Different standards for men and women in combat arms, MOS* and jobs, that’s not acceptable,” Hegseth said in a video posted to X, using the abbreviation for “military occupational specialty,” or job type.
“We need to have the same standard — male or female — in our combat roles to ensure our men and women who are under our leaders, or in those formations, have the best possible leaders and the highest possible standards that are not based at all on your sex.”
The memo, which orders the military branches to “develop comprehensive plans to distinguish combat arms occupations [in the military] from non-combat arms occupations,” specifies in hand-underlined text that the soon-to-be-developed standards must not “result in any existing service member being held to a lower standard.”
“All entry-level and sustained physical fitness requirements within combat arms positions must be sex-neutral, based solely on the operational demands of the occupation and the readiness needed to confront any adversary,” Hegseth wrote.
“The effort will ensure combat standards are clear, mission-focused and reflective of the unique physical demands placed on our service members in various roles,” his memo added.
The memo also laid out what kinds of standards all troops in ground combat, special operations or “specialized” roles such as explosive ordnance disposal technician must fit.
For example, Hegseth’s guidance says troops on the front lines should be able to “carry heavy loads, endure prolonged physical exertion and perform effectively in austere, hostile environments.”

“Service members in these roles must exhibit speed, strength, agility and endurance to navigate the demands of combat situations,” the document reads.
Service secretaries now have 60 days to submit their proposed combat-role standards to Hegseth, and military branches will then be required to implement the changes within six months.
“Soon we will have nothing but the highest standards for men and women in combat,” the secretary said.
Hegseth has repeatedly commented on the issue of women in combat before he was nominated to lead the Pentagon. On Nov. 7, the ex-Fox News personality told podcaster Shawn Ryan he “straight up” believed “we should not have women in combat roles.”
“It hasn’t made us more effective, hasn’t made us more lethal, [and] has made fighting more complicated,” he said at the time.
However, Hegseth later softened his opinion to say that both men and women could serve in combat roles so long as they met the same physical standards.
The move comes as Hegseth works to remove social indoctrination and engineering programs from the military and move toward a merit-based, apolitical armed forces with an emphasis on warfighting.
Compiled from articles published on March 31 by Ben Whedon at JustTheNews[.]com and by Caitlin Doornbos at NY Post. Reprinted here for educational purposes only.
Questions
1. The first paragraph of a news article should answer the questions who, what, where and when. List the who, what, where and when of this news item. (NOTE: The remainder of a news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
2. Secretary Hegseth noted in a post on X: “Different physical standards for men and women in the U.S. military have existed for a long time. BUT, there were also combat roles that were male-only.” What was changed during the Obama administration that Secretary Hegseth is now revising?
3. How does Secretary Hegseth explain the need for the “Combat Arms Standards”?
4. a) What does Hegseth order the military branch heads to develop?
b) What is the purpose of this order?
5. What requirements are to be expected for all combat troops?
6. a) What deadline has the Secretary Hegseth given to the heads of the military branches?
b) How long will they have to implement the changes?
7. Read Secretary Hegseth’s new memorandum “Combat Arms Standards”
What do you think: Is this unreasonable – or is this common sense? Explain your answer.
8. In 2015, under the Obama administration, the Marine Corps conducted an analysis comparing the efficiency of all-male vs. male/female combat units. According to the Marine Corps Times, the study found that the former outperformed the latter “in nearly every capacity.”
The outlet reported that sex-integrated units not only “performed at lower overall levels, completed tasks more slowly and fired weapons with less accuracy than their all-male counterparts,” but female Marines also “sustained significantly higher injury rates and demonstrated lower levels of physical performance capacity overall.”
Are you surprised by this? Explain your answer.
9. Read some responses to Secretary Hegseth’s posts on X. Which do you find reasonable? Explain your answer.
Some responses from MEN:
- “Men and women should have different standards. We are built different. Women should also not serve in Infantry, [Army] Rangers, SF [Special Forces (Green Berets), [Navy] Seals, PJs [Pararescue], etc.”
- “Equal standards across the board. No special classes or privileges. If you want to fight with your fellow soldiers you should be expected to live up to the standards.”
- “Combat readiness over political correctness. Pete Hegseth just did what the Pentagon should’ve done years ago: One standard. One mission. One team. If you want to serve in a combat role, you meet the standard. Period. “
- “Women shouldn’t be in combat roles, and everyone knows it.”
Some responses from WOMEN:
- “That’s great! I remember boot camp I could run the rings around some of the male recruits, they’d pass out and I’d keep running! Gotta do what you gotta do. Don’t hold back. Carry your weight and then some.”
- “We’re currently in a recruiting shortage and we’re not even engaged in an open conflict. How does this [Hegseth’s order] help that situation?”
- “There are definitely significant differences between males and females, that is why we don’t want males in women’s competitions.”
Background
Read the Pentagon’s new memorandum “Combat Arms Standards“
Daily “Answers” emails are provided for Daily News Articles, Tuesday’s World Events and Friday’s News Quiz.