print Print...
(by Andrea Billups, WashingtonTimes.com) LANSING, MICH. – Rusty Bongard keeps a 1976 photo of motorcycle lobbyist Jim Rhoades sitting on the steps of the Michigan statehouse in Lansing, holding a sign [opposing helmet laws].
Now 35 years after that picture was snapped, Mr. Bongard, a spokesman for the biker advocacy and safety group ABATE, thinks the time is right for Michigan’s governor to sign a law repealing the state’s mandatory motorcycle helmet law, giving bikers the freedom to decide what safety measures are right for them.
“We’ve been meeting and greeting governors and legislators for 30-some years and it’s been a huge commitment,” he says of the groups passion to keep the legislation alive. “All indications that we have now is that he is going to sign it.”
The “he” Mr. Bongard refers to is Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, a Republican who has had the legislation on his desk since April 2. Although he has said little about his plans for the bill, passed by the state Senate on March 28 by a 24-14 vote, advocates for freedom are ever more hopeful. Former Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm, a Democrat, vetoed similar legislation twice during her two terms in office.
“Aside from all of the media hype that you hear, that it is because we want to feel the wind in our hair, that is not the case,” Mr. Bongard said.
“Most of us who have been involved in this for a long time have studied and have experienced the value of the helmet in terms of safety,” he said. “You always got the guy who’ll say a motorcycle helmet helped save my life, but if the dead could speak there would be 10 for every one of those who’d say a helmet didn’t do anything for them. We think training awareness policies by the state government to make motorcycle awareness and safety a bigger strategy is better than putting a Chinese-made plastic hat on your head.”
Opponents of the bill cite public safety concerns and rising insurance and health care costs as reason enough for the governor not to repeal the current law.
Dr. Steven E. Newman, president of the Michigan State Medical Society, appealed to the group’s membership to fight against the repeal, noting the impact of injuries incurred in motorcycle accidents.
“As a practicing neurologist seeing traumatic brain injuries daily, I am concerned that the legislature hasn’t taken action to prevent this expensive, long-term, disabling, and highly preventable condition,” Dr. Newman, said in a statement.
“Not only will it put thousands of lives at risk, but it will likely drive up health care costs and drive many victims into the Medicaid program at a time when our state can least afford it,” he said. “After examining the metrics about motorcycle accidents and traumatic head injuries that could have been prevented by the use of crash helmets, I hope Governor Snyder agrees that vetoing this bill is a no-brainer.”
Mr. Snyder’s spokesman, Terry Stanton, said Wednesday afternoon that the governor was continuing to review the legislation and had not yet made a decision. “There is no indication of a time frame,” he said, noting the governor had 14 days to consider the measure by law.
Helmet proponents, citing statistics that show there are more than 3,200 motorcycle accidents a year in Michigan, say safety is no joking matter.
Laws requiring all motorcyclists to wear a helmet are in place in 20 states and the District of Columbia.
Supporters of the Michigan helmet law argue a repeal would impact automobile drivers as well – in the pocketbook.
“As more and more costly insurance claims increase as a result of motorcycle accidents, especially since the occurrence and severity of injuries sustained in motorcycle accidents are often greater than those in automobile accidents, we can expect rates to go up for motorists across the state,” Dr. Newman wrote in an editorial published in the Holland (Mich.) Sentinel.
Copyright 2012 The Washington Times, LLC. Reprinted from The Washington Times for educational purposes only. Visit the website at washingtontimes.com.
Questions
1. Define the following words as used in the article:
- repeal (para. 2)
- mandatory (para. 2)
- veto (para. 4)
- proponent (para. 12)
2. How many states currently have helmet laws (laws requiring motorcyclists to wear helmets)?
3. a) The Michigan state Senate recently passed a bill repealing the state’s mandatory motorcycle helmet law. What must happen for the bill to become a law?
b) When would this occur?
4. For what reasons do proponents support the repeal of the motorcycle helmet law?
5. For what reasons do supporters of a mandatory helmet law oppose repealing it?
6. a) Does your state have a helmet law?
b) Do you think your state should have a helmet law? Explain your answer.
Resources
ABATE opposes helmet laws:
- ABATE is a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the overall rights and promoting the safe operating practices of all Michigan motorcyclists.
- ABATE of Michigan is a freedom of choice organization. Believing that the rider is best able to decide the type of motorcycle to ride, and the type and extent of safety gear worn.
- ABATE’s primary objective is to monitor motorcycle related legislation and encourage all members to become politically involved.
- Visit the website at: ABATEofMichigan.org
Read Dr. Newman’s letter to the editor opposing the repeal of Michigan’s helmet laws at: hollandsentinel.com.
Read about motorcycle helmet safety from The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which is a nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries, and property damage that result from crashes on the nation’s roads.
Daily “Answers” emails are provided for Daily News Articles, Tuesday’s World Events and Friday’s News Quiz.